An exemplifcation of the Connecticut Charter - photo 1
An exemplifcation of the Connecticut Charter - photo 2
An exemplifcation of the Connecticut Charter - photo 3
An exemplifcation of the Connecticut Charter - photo 4

An exemplifcation of the Connecticut Charter

Lot 142
27.01.2023 10:00UTC +00:00
Classic
Sold
$ 22 680
AuctioneerCHRISTIE'S
Event locationUnited Kingdom, London
Buyer Premiumsee on Website%
Archive
The auction is completed. No bids can be placed anymore.
Archive
ID 887920
Lot 142 | An exemplifcation of the Connecticut Charter
Estimate value
$ 20 000 – 30 000
CONNECTICUT CHARTER – CHARLES II (1630-1685) – GEORGE III (1738-1820). Manuscript exemplification with royal wax seal, of the 1662 charter issued by Charles II for Connecticut, Westminster, 23 April 1765.

Five pages (versos blank) vellum 610 x 760mm, with ornate printed borders, red lined rules and embossed blue paper tax stamp affixed to left margin of each leaf (mild cockling). Bound with cord at lower margins that is also affixed to 145mm diameter royal wax seal bearing an equestrian portrait of George III (verso rubbed). Housed in its original container and metal cylinder housing the seal (seal compartment separated).

A magnificent exemplification of the Royal Charter of Connecticut. Although established in the late 1630s, Connecticut's government operated without any official sanction until 1662 when Charles II issued a royal charter which combined of the colonies of New Haven and Connecticut—the latter comprising the settlements along the Connecticut River around Hartford. Except for a brief interruption when Sir Edmund Andros attempted to enforce a new government under the Dominion of New England, the charter remained in force until 1818, when Connecticut adopted a new constitution.

This document, an official exemplification of the original 1662 document purportedly hid away in the "Charter Oak" to defy Andros, is headed with a decorated capital "G" framing an engraved portrait of George III. Following the monarch's offical greeting, the document certifies that the "Inrollment of certain Letters patent of Incorporation of our royal Predecessor Charles the Second late King of England … made and granted to the then Governor and Company of the English Colony of Connecticut in New England in America," had been inspected, and "said Inrollment Remains duly Inrolled and upon Record amongst the Rolls and Records of our high Court of Chancery the tenor whereof is in the Words following to wit…." From there, the engrosser carefully copies the text of the 1662 charter word for word.

On the final page, the document states that it was produced on the request of three London merchants: Anthony Bacon (1716-17896, misspelled "Baron" in this document), Gilbert Franklyn (ca. 1733 - 1799), and Anthony Richardson. Research thus far has not shed light on any direct connections between Connecticut and these three merchants, but several had landholdings and business interests in Maryland as well as Caribbean sugar islands and they figured prominently in the slave trade. The most prominent of the three was Anthony Bacon. He was born in England, but moved to Maryland after his parents both died, and lived with his maternal uncles, both tobacco merchants, one of whom (Anthony Richardson) is named in the present document. Bacon was active in both the tobacco and slave trades, but in 1764 withdrew from tobacco to become a miltary contractor. In 1764, he stood for Parliament and sat as an MP for Aylesbury until 1780 while also becoming involved in iron production— controlling mines, a blast furnace as well as the Plymouth Iron Works. As a group, the trio of Bacon, Francklyn and Richardson appear to have had one other joint-business venture: the three sought a grant of 2,000 acres of land on the Magdalene Islands for the purpose of maintaining a fishery in the St. Lawrence River estuary. (Munroe & Fitzroy, eds., 4 Acts of the Privy Council of England, p. 551) During his time in Parliament, Anthony Bacon was a member of the Board of Trade and Plantations, and during its 3 January 1765 meeting, "the charters of Rhode Island and Connecticut were read and considered." The original Connecticut charter did claim the entire eastern shore of Narraganset Bay (most of Rhode Island), but that dispute was largely settled in the early 18th century. (See Journals of the Board of Trade and Plantations, Vol. 12, pp. 132-143). Exemplification documents like these have been known to have been presented as evidence in inter-colonial territorial disputes (See Papers of John Jay, Columbia University, Document 1768, October 19, https://dlc.library.columbia.edu/jay/ldpd:63562) To further complicate matters, the present document has been part of the family of John Jay for several generations. No evidence of direct contacts between the Jay family and Bacon, Franklyn or Richardson have yet to emerge in the documentary record.

Another theory that might provide a promising line of inquiry into the trio's connection to the interests of Connecticut may have involved some currently-unknown dealings in western land—a very common area of speculation among merchants and planters on both sides of the Atlantic. If they had any interest in lands in the upper Susquehanna valley, they may have been keen to better understand the nature of the "sea-to-sea" grant issued to Connecticut in the 1662 charter. That grant led to overlapping land claims in northeastern Pennsylvania that led to a series of short-lived wars between Connecticut and Pennsylvania settlers in the region surrounding modern-day Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania: a town established by Connecticut's Susquehanna Company in in 1769. Interrupted by the Revolutionary War, the conflict simmered until a settlement was reached between the two states in 1799. Provenance: Descendants of John Jay.
Historical era:Period of George III
Place of origin:United Kingdom
Auction house category:Letters, documents and manuscripts
Address of auction CHRISTIE'S
8 King Street, St. James's
SW1Y 6QT London
United Kingdom
Preview
13.01.2023 – 27.01.2023
Phone +44 (0)20 7839 9060
Email
4FQ.AYGKAGLUQ@FO3G@
Buyer Premium see on Website
Conditions of purchaseConditions of purchase

More from Creator

Banning two works by John Milton
Banning two works by John Milton
$100

Related terms

Frequently asked questions

First of all, you should register to be able to purchase at auction. After confirming your email address, enter your personal information in your user profile, such as your first name, last name, and mail address. Choose a lot from the upcoming auction and the maximum amount you want to place on it. After confirmation of your choice, we will send your application by e-mail to the appropriate auction house. If the auction house accepts a request, it will participate in the auction. You can view the current status of a bid at any time in your personal account in the "Bids" section.
Auctions are performed by auction houses and each of the auction houses describes their terms of auction. You can see the texts in the section "Auction information".
The results of the auction are published within a few days after the end of the auction. In the top menu of the site, find the tab "Auctions". Click on it and you will be on the auction catalog page, where you can easily find the category "Results". After opening it, select the desired auction from the list, enter and view the current status of the interested lot.
The information about the auction winners is confidential. The auction winner will receive a direct notification from the auction house responsible with instructions for further action: an invoice for payment and the manner in which the goods will be received.
Each of the auction houses has its own payment policy for the won lots. All auction houses accept bank transfers, most of them accept credit card payments. In the near future you will find detailed information for each case in the section "Auction information" on the page of the auction catalog and the lot.
Shipment of the won lot depends on its size. Small items can be delivered by post. Larger lots are sent by courier. Employees of the auction houses will offer you a wide range to choose from.
No. The archive serves as a reference for the study of auction prices, photographs and descriptions of works of art.
?>